Loading...
Browse 455 motion patterns extracted from federal court filings across 94 district courts. Each pattern captures argument structures, citations, evidence strategies, and win rate signals from real litigation outcomes.
Showing 361–384 of 455 patterns
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT → EMERGENCY MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE CUSTODY → TO THE HONORABLE MAGISTRATE JUDGE OF THE → DECLARATION OF MENTAL DISABILITY AND LEG
INTRODUCTION → BACKGROUND → ARGUMENT → I. X'S OBJECTIONS TO DISCOVERY ABOUT ELO → II. X'S OBJECTIONS TO DISCOVERY ABOUT CO → III. X'S OBJECTIONS TO AUTHENTICATING PO → IV. X'S OBJECTIONS TO DISCOVERY ABOUT AD → CONCLUSION
peter-eugene alvarado, an 18-year-old with severe mental disability, is unable to manage his affairs and is currently detained in unsafe and discriminatory conditions at brazoria county jail.
Landry v. Air Line Pilots Ass'n Intern. AFL-CIO, 901 F.2d 404, 435-36 (5th Cir. 1990)
Petrus v. Bowen, 833 F.2d 581, 583 (5th Cir. 1987)
Brown v. DFS Servs., L.L.C., 434 F. App'x 347, 351 (5th Cir. 2011)
United States ex rel. Gonzalez v. Fresenius Med. Care N. Am., 571 F. Supp. 2d 766, 768 (W.D. Tex. 2008)
Barrie v. Nueces Cty. Dist. Attorney's Office, No. 2:17-CV-00204, 2017 WL 11713691, at *2 (S.D. Tex. Nov. 13, 2017)
declaration
other
expert reports from a closely related prior case (altice i) are highly relevant because both cases involve the same defendants, same claims, same theories of liability, and overlapping infringement pe
the altice i expert reports address altice's system for processing copyright infringement notices, altice's damages theories, and altice's financial data, all of which are directly at issue in this ca
a small subset of altice's instant messenger conversations requires additional context (10 messages before and after) to be understood, as altice produced them individually without conversational flow
Infernal Tech., LLC v. Microsoft Corp., 2019 WL 5388442 (E.D. Tex. May 3, 2019)
I. INTRODUCTION → II. BACKGROUND → III. ARGUMENT → A. EXPERT REPORTS ABOUT ALTICE'S SYSTEM → B. SELECT INSTANT MESSENGER CONVERSATION → IV. CONCLUSION
TABLE OF CONTENTS → I. INTRODUCTION → II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND → III. ARGUMENT → A. HEADWATER'S P.R. 3-1 CONTENTIONS ACCU → B. VERIZON'S FAILURE TO PRODUCE THE REQU → IV. CONCLUSION
I. INTRODUCTION → II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND → III. ARGUMENT → A. HEADWATER'S P.R. 3-1 CONTENTIONS ACCU → B. T-MOBILE'S FAILURE TO PRODUCE THE REQ → IV. CONCLUSION
I. INTRODUCTION → II. ARGUMENTS & AUTHORITIES → A. PLAINTIFF UNTIMELY FILED HER RESPONSE → B. SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION IS A PRER → C. PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS, INCLUDING HER DTP → 1. PLAINTIFF DID ASSERT A BREACH OF CONT → 2. PLAINTIFF'S “NON-CONTRACTUAL” CLAIMS → D. THE VIVINT DEFENDANTS DID NOT WAIVE A
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DIS → PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE → INTRODUCTION → BACKGROUND → LEGAL STANDARD → ARGUMENT → I. THE SUBPOENA SEEKS RELEVANT DOCUMENTS → II. MUDDY WATERS HAS NOT MET ITS BURDEN
PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY F → I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND → II. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND → III. ARGUMENT → A. PLAINTIFFS REQUEST RELEVANT AND LIMIT → B. DI INAPPROPRIATELY ASSERTED GENERAL O → C. DI ASSERTED OBJECTIONS WITHOUT A BASI → CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
I. INTRODUCTION → II. RELEVANT FACTUAL BACKGROUND → III. LEGAL STANDARD → IV. ARGUMENT AND AUTHORITIES → V. CONCLUSION
the subpoena seeks relevant documents and communications regarding bonilla's intent, tti's damages, and discussions about the fallout of their actions.
muddy waters has not met its burden to show tti's requests are overbroad or unduly burdensome, as the requests are narrowly tailored to specific events and time periods.
tti's requests do not seek privileged information, as they pertain to pre-litigation financial relationships and commercial transactions with a third party, and muddy waters failed to produce a privil