Loading...
Browse 455 motion patterns extracted from federal court filings across 94 district courts. Each pattern captures argument structures, citations, evidence strategies, and win rate signals from real litigation outcomes.
Showing 337–360 of 455 patterns
plaintiff's allegations are conclusory and lack supporting facts, failing the facial plausibility standard required by twombly and iqbal.
any allegations in the complaint that contradict information in the exhibits should be ignored, as the exhibits show plaintiff's behavior was consistent with mental illness and intoxication.
plaintiff's allegations of excessive force are demonstrably inaccurate or conclusory, and the deputies acted reasonably and used reasonable force under the circumstances.
DEFENDANT BATTON'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND → NATURE AND STAGE OF PROCEEDINGS → FACTS → STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE → STANDARD OF REVIEW → SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT → ARGUMENT → CONCLUSORY ALLEGATIONS
I → II → III
NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY IN SUPP → CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I. BACKGROUND → II. SUBPOENA DEFECTS AND CHALLENGE → III. PRAYER → CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE → CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Better Keiki, LLC v. MairicoDirect, 2018 WL 5305571 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 29, 2018)
the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to determine frand rates for global patent portfolios.
determining frand rates for global patent portfolios would require the court to determine royalties due on foreign patents and patents owned by parties not before the court.
the u.s. patents constitute only a fraction of the larger portfolio, making a court's opinion on the appropriate royalty rate merely advisory.
the reasoning from roku, inc. v. access advance llc regarding lack of jurisdiction over foreign patents applies to samsung's breach of contract counterclaims.
Roku, Inc. v. Access Advance LLC, No. 1:24-cv-13217-RGS (D. Mass.)
prior_court_order
other
a stay will prevent unnecessary expense and burden for both parties by avoiding discovery on claims that may be dismissed by the pending motion.
a stay could simplify the contested issues by narrowing the scope of discovery if the motion to dismiss is partially granted.
a stay is appropriate because discovery has just begun, no scheduling order has been entered, and no trial date has been set.
the subpoena is procedurally defective for failing to comply with frcp 45(b)(1) by not tendering witness fees.
the subpoena is procedurally defective for failing to provide a reasonable time for compliance as required by frcp 45(d)(2)(b) and for lack of proper notice and conferral under frcp 5(c)(2) and frcp 2
Landis v. N. Amer. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254 (1936)
GreatGigz Sols., LLC v. CHRISTUS Health, No. 6:21-CV-01310-ADA, 2022 WL 22869797, at *2 (W.D. Tex. Sept. 12, 2022)
In re Trustees of Bos. Univ. Patent Cases, No. CV 13-12327-PBS, 2014 WL 12576638, at *2 (D. Mass. May 16, 2014)
I. BACKGROUND → II. ARGUMENT AND AUTHORITIES → III. PRAYER → CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE → CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE