Loading...
Browse 455 motion patterns extracted from federal court filings across 94 district courts. Each pattern captures argument structures, citations, evidence strategies, and win rate signals from real litigation outcomes.
Showing 193–216 of 455 patterns
a rate of $650 per hour is reasonable and customary for a 35-year trial attorney with expertise in labor and employment law in the dallas community.
counsel melvin keith ogle misused his position as counsel to abuse the process by opposing an amendment that did not affect his client.
Liberty Ins. Underwriters Inc. v. First Mercury Ins. Co., No. 3:17-cv-3029-M, 2019 WL 7900687 (N.D. Tex. Mar. 11, 2019)
Jorge v. Atl. Hous. Found., No. 3:20-cv-2782-N, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 183916 (N.D. Tex. Oct 07, 2022)
Tollett v. City of Kemah, 285 F.3d 357 (5th Cir. 2002)
Combs v. City of Huntington, 829 F.3d 388 (5th Cir. 2016)
PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR AN AWARD OF REAS -> APPLICABLE LAW -> THE NUMBER OF HOURS REASONABLY WORKED -> THE PREVAILING HOURLY RATE IN THE COMMUN
MOTION FOR SANCTIONS TO COUNSEL MELVIN K -> I. INTRODUCTION AND FACTS -> II. STANDARD OF REVIEW -> III. ARGUMENT AND AUTHORITIES -> IV. CONCLUSION -> V. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
I. INTRODUCTION AND FACTS -> II. STANDARD OF REVIEW -> III. ARGUMENT AND AUTHORITIES -> IV. CONCLUSION -> V. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
plaintiff is entitled to a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction to compel defendant to immediately deposit cash collateral of $11,343,949.00 as required by the indemnity agreement.
Gray Cas. & Sur. Co. v. 3i Contracting, LLC, No. 3:23-CV-2511-L, 2024 WL 1121800 (N.D. Tex. Mar. 13, 2024)
Anderson v. Jackson, 556 F.3d 351, 360 (5th Cir. 2009)
Holland Am. Ins. Co. v. Succession of Roy, 777 F.2d 992, 997 (5th Cir. 1985)
I. BACKGROUND -> II. RELEVANT LAW -> III. THE SURETIES' MOTIONS FOR PRELIMINA -> A. A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION IS MEANT TO -> B. THE CONTRACTUAL STIPULATION DOES NOT -> C. THE SURETIES FAILED TO DEMONSTRATE IR -> IV. CONCLUSION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT -> PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF -> I. SUMMARY -> II. FACTS -> A. THE INDEMNITY AGREEMENT AND THE SURET -> B. THE INDEMNITORS' BREACH OF THE INDEMN -> III. ARGUMENTS AND AUTHORITIES -> A. NECESSITIES OF INJUNCTIVE RELIEF MET
PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF -> I. SUMMARY -> II. FACTS -> A. THE INDEMNITY AGREEMENT AND THE SURET -> B. THE INDEMNITORS' BREACH OF THE INDEMN -> III. ARGUMENTS AND AUTHORITIES -> A. THE INDEMNITY AGREEMENT IS GOVERNED B -> B. DEFENDANTS' WAIVERS IN THE INDEMNITY
I -> II -> III
peter-eugene alvarado, an 18-year-old disabled adult, is currently held in brazoria county jail and has an urgent health condition.
peter underwent heart surgery prior to incarceration and has not received post-operative medical care, cardiac checkups, or follow-up with a licensed cardiologist during his confinement.
ongoing detention without cardiac evaluation poses a significant risk to his life and constitutes deliberate medical indifference under estelle v. gamble.
failure to provide essential medical treatment violates peter's rights under the eighth and fourteenth amendments, the americans with disabilities act, and the federal civil rights act.
Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97 (1976)
42 U.S.C. § 12132
42 U.S.C. § 1983