Loading...
Browse 455 motion patterns extracted from federal court filings across 94 district courts. Each pattern captures argument structures, citations, evidence strategies, and win rate signals from real litigation outcomes.
Showing 145–168 of 455 patterns
UNITED STATES' OPPOSED MOTION FOR ACCELE -> CONCLUSION -> CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE -> CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
ramirez-saucedo is not entitled to raise a duress defense because he has failed to make a sufficient showing that he is entitled to that defense as a matter of law.
jury nullification arguments are improper as juries have no right to disregard the law as expounded by the court.
Ericsson, Inc. v. D-Link Sys., Inc., 773 F.3d 1201 (Fed. Cir. 2014)
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993)
prior_court_order
declaration
the superseding indictment is impermissibly duplicitous because it alleges at least two separate conspiracies in a single count.
mr. jordan's indictment is multiplicitous, which violates the double jeopardy clause of the united states constitution.
prior_court_order
mr. kennedy's reliance on statements by ecofactor's ceo and counsel without independent analysis renders his opinion unreliable.
I. INTRODUCTION → II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND → III. LEGAL STANDARD → IV. ARGUMENT → V. CONCLUSION
I. INTRODUCTION → II. BACKGROUND → III. LEGAL STANDARD → IV. DR. SCHAEFER'S INFRINGEMENT OPINIONS → V. CONCLUSION → CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
TABLE OF CONTENTS → TABLE OF AUTHORITIES → I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND → A. MS. BENNIS' AFFIRMATIVE REASONABLE RO → B. MS. BENNIS' ROYALTY STACKING OPINIONS → C. MS. BENNIS' OPINIONS REGARDING NONINF → II. ARGUMENT → A. MS. BENNIS' SELECTION OF REASONABLE R
TABLE OF CONTENTS → I. INTRODUCTION → II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND → III. ARGUMENT → A. MS. DWYER'S “SALE OF THE ASSERTED PAT → B. MS. DWYER'S “COBBLESTONE'S FLAWED DAM → C. MS. DWYER'S BASELESS ASSERTIONS OF “R → D. MS. DWYER'S OPINIONS THAT DO NOT PERT
I. INTRODUCTION → II. LEGAL STANDARDS → III. ARGUMENT → A. THE COURT SHOULD EXCLUDE UNDER DAUBER → 1. “SUB-OPTIMAL” DOES NOT REQUIRE DETERM → 2. DR. VAN DER WEIDE'S NEW INTERPRETATIO → B. DR. VAN DER WEIDE'S ATTEMPT TO INTROD → C. DR. VAN DER WEIDE'S RELIANCE OR COPYI
plaintiff is unable to obtain her 6-month trust fund statement, hindering her ability to proceed in forma pauperis.
biological women at fmc-carswell are housed with biological male inmates, including sex offenders and a white supremacist, creating unsafe conditions.
the prison is short-staffed, and inmates are denied grievance forms and other documents, preventing them from addressing these conditions.
president trump's executive order on administering federal prisons should be enforced under 18 u.s.c. § 3621(b) to segregate men from women.
there is a belief that men, if removed, might harm women in the prison, necessitating immediate segregation until litigation is completed.
18 USC Section 3621(b)
Whole Woman's Health v. Jackson, 13 F.4th 434, 441 (5th Cir. 2021)
Coastal Corp. v. Texas E. Corp., 869 F.2d 817, 819–20 (5th Cir. 1989)